5 Years on …

Sunday, January 20, 2008

The failure to learn and go forward from bushfire disasters is a sad indictment of a modern society.

We constantly hear the excuses after all large bushfires, including the 2003 disaster, that blame shouldn’t be apportioned because people are supposed to have done the best they could in difficult circumstances.

It is not “blame” that is sought but simply accountability and responsibility to the community.

Until failures are brought to account, nothing will improve as evidenced by the parlous state of bushfire management in the ACT.

But then again, as “they” constantly tell me, I am not an expert, the only experts are those that reign in Simon Corbell’s department and I am once again reminded that I am just a silly old fool living in the past.

We will see as before, as we leave it to history to judge that.

Val Jeffery, Tharwa from the Canberra Times 19 January 2008

City still mired in the ashes Canberra Times 19 January 2008

“What is frustrating is that, if there were another fire tomorrow, much the same delay, confusion, and incapacity to move quickly would occur. That might be a proof that we have not got over it yet.”

Canberra rethinks bushfire risk after 2003 firestorm from ABC website Posted January 18, 2008 10:24:00

Rivers Volunteer Brigade captain Matt Dutkiewicz agrees.

“Fires don’t generally listen to politics or money or whatever. So you generally need to have a step back from that,” he said.

Bushfire in Namadgi National Park

Monday, January 14, 2008

Namadgi fire contained ABC Website Posted January 14, 2008 14:17:00

Helicopters called in to fight Namadgi blaze ABC Website Posted January 14, 2008 10:33:00

Update No 3 – 3:00pm 14/1/2008

The ACT Rural Fire Service advise the bushfire in southern part of the Namadgi National Park is now contained. Fire crews have commenced mopping up which is expected to continued for a few days.

ACT Ambulance Service intensive care paramedics have treated one firefighter on scene for heat stress.

Update No 2 – 12:00pm 14/1/2008

The bushfire is currently uncontrolled approximately 5 hectares in size about 2km SSE of the Mt Clear campground in very rugged terrain in the far south of the Namadgi National Park near the ACT/NSW border.

It’s suspected to have started from a lightning strike during Saturday’s storm but that’s unconfirmed at this stage.

There is multiple firefighting crews from the ACT Rural Fire Service on scene including remote area firefighters who are specially trained to fight bushfires in this type of country.

Equipment on the ground includes three water bombing helicopters and three heavy tankers, three light units and two raft crews.

Bulldozers are also been used around the perimeter of the fireground as well.

The ACT SES is providing support with communications, logistics and staging area management.

Update 1 – 6:00am 14/1/2008

The ACT Emergency Services Agency is responding to a small bushfire burning in the far south of the Namadgi National Park.

The fire, reported late last night, is located southeast of the Mt Clear campground near the ACT/NSW border.

Two heavy tankers and a light unit responded to the bushfire overnight.

Today three helicopters, a remote aerial firefighting team and six RFS tankers have been sent to fight the fire.

The fire danger is high in the ACT today.

Fire towers left unmanned

Thursday, October 4, 2007

Fire towers left unmanned From ABC website October 4, 2007

“Emergency Services Minister Simon Corbell says it is usual practice to man the towers in the high danger period between 12:00pm and 05:00pm AEST.”

Start of Bushfire Season

Monday, October 1, 2007

Record dry puts heat on fire season from Canberra Times

“It’s not going to take very much for that vegetation to dry out and be susceptible to fire.”

Catastrophic fires …

Wednesday, September 26, 2007

Fire danger up 300pc by mid-century: CSIRO from ABC Website September 26, 2007

Chief officer with the Country Fire Service in South Australia, Euan Ferguson, warns that more bushfires like those that devastated Canberra in 2003 and SA’s Eyre Peninsula in 2005 are likely.

“It reinforces our message that there will be times when no force known to mankind can suppress these bushfires,” he said.

Climate group warns of catastrophic fires from ABC Website September 26, 2007

“Conditions which are called catastrophic and that is similar to what Canberra experienced in 2003, they occur once every 32 years,” he said.

“But they will occur once every five years unless world leaders and Australia cut greenhouse gases and build on that Kyoto framework,” Mr Connor said.

Firefighters at risk

Sunday, September 23, 2007

ACT Govt put firefighters at risk from the Canberra Times 23 September 2007

” … there was now no reliable system to track vehicles and relay vital information during a big bushfire.”

“You need a system to back up the people on the ground, to get what we call a common operating picture.”

Firefighter denied reply

Friday, August 31, 2007

A leading volunteer firefighter has taken the unusual step of seeking a “citizen’s right of reply” in the Legislative Assembly to respond to statements made by Emergency Services

However, the Assembly’s administration and procedure committee members split on whether the issue warranted a reply. Liberal MLA Brendan Smyth and Greens MLA De Foskey believed it did, but Speaker Wayne Berry and Labor MLA Karin MacDonald said it did not; which meant the reply was not allowed.

ACT Volunteer Brigades Association president Pat Barling took offence at Mr Corbell’s comments in the Assembly on March 15 after volunteer firefighters had earlier protested outside the building against the proposed emergency services restructure.

He objected to Mr Corbell’s assertions that volunteers had been invited to discuss the creation of the Emergency Services Agency but had declined and instead held a rally. He said neither Mr Corbell nor the Agency’s commissioner, Gregor Manson, had made the invitation and he wanted his objections recorded in the Assembly.

“We believe the minister has misrepresented the ACT Volunteer Brigades Association and misled the Assembly on this matter.” Mr Barling’s reply was not tabled, but Mr Smyth read it out in the Assembly so it would be recorded, saying there was still “much disquiet” within the ranks of the volunteer firefighters.

There were concerns about the restructure but also other serious issues such as the safety of new tankers used by the brigades. Mr Corbell said he stood by his comments.

He was not focused on the past but the future, and believed his relationship with the volunteers was strong, not least because he met with them every six weeks to discuss issues.

Megan Doherty
Canberra Times Friday, August 31, 2007

Application for Citizen’s Right of Reply: President of the ACT – the reply …

Friday, August 31, 2007

STANDING COMMITTEE ON ADMINISTRATION AND PROCEDURE

AUGUST 2007

  1. Mr Pat Barling, on behalf of the ACT Volunteer Brigades Association, has made an application under the procedure adopted by the Assembly on 4 May 1995, for the publication of a citizen’s right of reply to references made in the Legislative Assembly on 15 March 2007.
  2. In considering Mr Barling’s submission, the committee has had regard to the terms of the Assembly resolution.
  3. The committee considered Mr Barling’s initial application and on 24 May 2007 requested that Mr Barling provide further information as to how he and/or the organisation had been adversely affected in the matter with particular reference to paragraphs (1) and (1) (a) of the resolution of the Assembly.
  4. Additional information was submitted by Mr Barling on 12 June 2007 and following considerable discussion at a meeting on 24 July 2007 the Committee was deadlocked on whether to grant a citizen’s right of reply. As it could not reach a resolution on the matter, the committee agreed, having regard to the limitations set by paragraph 7 of the resolution on a citizen’s right of reply, that it would report that no further action be taken by the Committee in relation to the submission. At a meeting held on Friday 17 August 2007, the Committee adopted this report.
  5. The Committee therefore recommends that no further action be taken by the Assembly in relation to the submission.

Wayne Berry MLA
Presiding Member
August 2007

CITIZENS’ RIGHT OF REPLY

Friday, August 31, 2007

ACT Volunteer Brigades Association take offence at remarks made in the Legislative Assembly by Simon Corbell, Minister for Police & Emergency Services about the Association during parliamentary debate on the 15 March 2007 as reported in the EDITED PROOF TRANSCRIPT.

Our Association wishes to use the process of Citizens’ Right of Reply to respond to those remarks and to ask for our response to be published in the parliamentary record.

Below is the relevant section (P630)

Emergency Services Agency-consultation

MR MULCAHY: My question is to the Minister for Emergency Services. Minister, on 6 March 2007 the new Commissioner for Emergency Services and you announced a new management structure for the Emergency Services Agency. In the business plan for the agency for the period to 2009-10 it says that the agency will “engage and value our people through careful and considered consultation and acting in an ethical way to all”.


The Volunteer Brigades Association today issued a media release stating that the restructure was “made without any meaningful discussion” with them. Minister, why did you and your commissioner fail to implement the requirement to engage in effective consultations before the new management structure was finalised?

MR CORBELL: We did not. What occurred in relation to the restructure is that a briefing on the restructure and the new business plan was provided to representatives of the volunteer brigades, to brigade captains and to SES commanders the day before the announcement, and the invitation was made for further discussion on the details of that in the coming weeks. The response, regrettably, of the volunteers in this regard was not to come back with further comments, not to seek further meetings, but to hold the rally they did today.

That is their decision. They are entitled to approach it in that manner. But the offer was made at the time for further discussion. That offer remains and that will be reiterated by the commissioner in the coming day or so, when he will reiterate his offer to sit down and discuss these issues in more detail. I think the issue that we need to address in particular is that, if the volunteers have concerns about how the management structure will impact on their operational affairs, we need to have that discussion. We stand ready to have that discussion and the invitation will be made again to the volunteer groups to invite them to engage in that discussion.

MR MULCAHY: I ask the Minister a supplementary question. Minister, why have you not provided sufficient time to the four services to consider and comment on the changes to the structure of the ESA?

MR CORBELL: I think I have just answered that question.

In response to Mr Mulcahy question Mr Corbell responded ” and the invitation was made for further discussion on the details of that in the coming weeks. The response, regrettably, of the volunteers in this regard was not to come back with further comments, not to seek further meetings, but to hold the rally they did today.”

There were 5 people at that briefing the ESA Commissioner, Mr Pat Barling (President of the ACT Volunteer Brigades Association) Mr Val Jeffery (representative of the ACT Fire Controller Group) Mr Kevin Jeffery (Chair of the ACT Bush Fire Council) and Miss Vicki Munslow (representative of the ACT SES Senior Leadership Group).

No such invitation was ever made by the ESA Commissioner or for that matter by the Minister. Up to the time of the volunteers protest on the 15 March no correspondence was received by our Association with respect to further discussions on the restructure. We believe that the Minister has misrepresented the ACT Volunteer Brigades Association and mislead the Assembly on this matter.

Our Association notes that very little notice was given to the us to attend this briefing, less than 12 hours. This lack of notice in itself (which is also at odds with the Governments own ACT Government Community Engagement Service Charter) shows a complete lack of respect for our Association on such an important issue and is further evidence that no consultation was ever intended.

Further to this the position for Deputy Commissioner was advertised in the ACT Government Gazette on 15 March 2007 again suggesting no consultation was ever intended.

The Media Releases put out on the 6 March by the ESA Commissioner states

The draft ESA Three-Year Business Plan also includes a new structure for the ESA. “After reviewing the current structure and considering budget overruns for the previous two years I have determined some changes are necessary,” Commissioner Manson said.

There is no reference to a Draft restructure or any suggestion that it is up for any consultation Community or otherwise.

There are 3 “injured parties” that have been adversely affected in reputation by the Minister for Police and Emergency Services, Simon Corbell. Firstly the Rural Fire Service volunteers of the ACT, secondly the ACT Volunteer Brigades Association and me, personally, as the President of the VBA.

In a future interpretation of the Hansard of 15th March, 2007 any reasonable person would assume from Mr Corbell’s reply to Mr Mulcahy from the following transcript -

… and the invitation was made for further discussion on the details of that in the coming weeks. The response, regrettably, of the volunteers in this regard was not to come back with further comments, not to seek further meetings, but to hold the rally they did today.

That is their decision. They are entitled to approach it in that manner. But the offer was made at the time for further discussion.”

- that the volunteers were offered an opportunity for further discussions, that they refused an invitation to have further discussions on the restructure and that they chose to have a rally as an alternative to further discussions. The transcript implies that the volunteers were unreasonable and uncooperative over the issue of the restructure.

The truth of the matter is that no invitation for further discussion regarding the restructure of the ESA was ever given to me personally, as President of the VBA, or to the other delegates present for further discussion; in fact the door of consultation was slammed in our faces.

Bushfire volunteer’s pride themselves on their commitment to the ACT community and to have the Minister imply that they are unreasonable and uncooperative, from a future historical view of this issue, adversely affects their reputation.

The Minister states previously in Hansard of the same day:

“My door has always been open to volunteers. I have never refused a meeting. I have always sat down and talked to them. I have met with the VBA on numerous occasions.”

For the Minister to claim that the VBA refused “to come back with further comments, not to seek further meetings” is offensive as the Minister knows full well that no invitation was made to the VBA.

Again, he implies that the VBA are confrontationist and unwilling to discuss issues on the restructure, and that from a future historical view of this issue adversely affects the VBA’s reputation.

The Minister knows full well the countless hours that I, as President of the VBA, have put in unpaid hours, in attending meetings with himself, the CEO of JaCS and the ESA Commissioner and Acting Commissioners to resolve issues relating to RFS & SES volunteers.

He knows that I prefer to work with the various level of management/bureaucracy and I have always tried to avoid “media events”. For the Minister to imply that I would refuse to have a meeting on the restructure issue and would rather hold a “media event” does my reputation a great disservice. I have never contacted the media, except in the case of official media releases as President of the VBA. The only exceptions to this have been when the media has, in fact, contacted me in response to statements and actions of the Minister, the Government, JaCS and the Commissioner.

The Minister has mislead the Assembly in replying to Mr Mulcahy and in doing so has adversely affected the reputation of the ACT RFS volunteers, the VBA and Pat Barling (President of the VBA).

I request that this response on behalf of the RFS volunteers, the ACT VBA and Pat Barling (President of the ACT VBA) be included in the parliamentary record in Hansard.

Mr Pat Barling

(President of the ACT Volunteer Brigades Association)

FIRELINK …

Sunday, July 15, 2007

ACT Firelink system ‘waste of money’ from ABC website Fri Jul 13

“We’ve really bought a sledgehammer to peel peanuts,”

Company takes legal action after fire communications dumped from ABC website Fri Jul 13

ESA’s $4.5m system blunder from the Canberra Times Fri Jul 13

UPDATE 14 July 2007

Govt and ministers blamed for FireLink from the Canberra Times Sat Jul 14

Former ACT Emergency Services Authority commissioner Peter Dunn disputed claims yesterday that the ACT Government was kept in the dark on details of the $4.5million FireLink deal, saying a four-month trial of the technology had been approved by the Department of Justice and Community Safety in 2004.

UPDATE: Letters to the Editor Canberra Times 06 August 2007

Support for Dunn

Unfortunately the issue of the withdrawal of “Firelink” has been turned into a political football by Minister Simon Corbell with unfair and unwarranted criticism levelled at ex-ESA Commissioner Peter Dunn.

Mr Corbell has tried to use the turn-off of the system as a justification for returning the management of the emergency services to bureaucracy.

The unwarranted attack on Mr Dunn has reminded the community of the failures of the Government in the handling of the 2003 bushfire disaster before, during and after.

Mr Dunn’s short tenure of leadership of emergency services brought a brief breath of fresh air away from the strangulation of bureaucratic management that is not appropriate for emergency management.

Independence is essential and already we see stifling of operational initiatives with the return to bureaucratic management, for example in tanker replacements.

After the 2003 bushfires, the Government was prone to seeking “feel good” initiatives and it was in the light of that pressure that Firelink was conceived with ministerial support.

Although I have never been attracted to the concept of Firelink, it is grossly unfair for Mr Corbell to try to make political mileage at Mr Dunn’s expense. After all, three changes of ministers responsible for emergency services in three years and three changes in structures does little to give the community confidence in the wake of the 2003 disaster.

Firelink, or some similar “feel good” alternative, is not necessary but the control room for the Rural Fire Service must be removed from the over-complicated combined command centre (Comcen) as a matter of urgency and certainly before the fast approaching bushfire season.

It’s a simple, cost effective reality for the protection of the community.

Val Jeffery, Tharwa


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.